RPO vs MSP vs In-House Recruitment: What Works for Indian Organisations?

Filling the talent gap is tough, but finding talent fast is even tougher. Whether you’re an organization or a hiring manager, juggling multiple positions across different departments, you can feel the chaos that comes with recruitment. India’s hiring landscape has changed; it’s not just about who to hire anymore, it’s about how and how quickly you close the position.

Especially when establishing a new setup, there are questions about whether you should build an in-house team, outsource to an RPO, or bring in an MSP to manage contingent workers. Each model has its place, but choosing the wrong one can cost you time, money, and top talent.

In this blog, we will break down what RPO and MSP mean and which recruitment model in India works best for your organization.

What is RPO?

RPO, or Recruitment Process Outsourcing, is when you hand over part (or all) of your recruitment function to an external provider. It is like getting a full-fledged hiring team without the overhead of building one internally.

An RPO provider doesn’t just fill roles; they integrate with your HR team, use your brand, follow your processes, and act like an extension of your company. They handle everything from sourcing candidates to onboarding new hires. The numbers also tell a compelling story. The global RPO market hit 9.4 billion in 2024 and is expected to surge to USD 36. 4 billion by 2033. That’s a growth rate of 15.48% annually. This signals that more and more companies are ditching traditional hiring models for scalable alternatives.

What is MSP?

MSP stands for Managed Service Provider, but in recruitment terms, it refers to managing the contingent workforce. That includes contractors, freelancers, gig workers, and consultants.

But here is what makes MSPs different: while RPO focuses on permanent hires, MSP is all about filling temporary and project-based talent gaps. The MSP acts as a single point of contact between your company and multiple staffing agencies. They often do vendor management, compliance cost control, and quality checks. So if your organization relies heavily on project-based work or seasonal hiring (Common in IT, retail, and FMCG sectors), an MSP becomes your command centre for managing all those moving parts.

What is In-House Hiring?

This is the traditional route. You build your own recruitment team within the HR department. Your recruiters know your company culture inside out, they understand what kind of candidates fit best, and they have direct access to hiring managers. In-house recruitment vs. outsourcing is a never-ending debate, while some companies swear by keeping everything internal, others find it limiting.

In-house work brilliantly when you have predictable hiring needs, a strong employer brand, and the resources to invest in recruiting tools and training. Startups and mid-sized companies often start here before exploring other models.

Pros & Cons Comparison Table

Here are all three models side by side for a better understanding and to clearly see the trade-offs.

Aspect	RPO	MSP	In-House
Best For	High-volume, permanent hiring.	Managing contingent/contract workforce.	Companies with stable, predictable hiring needs.
Cost Structure	Fixed fee or per-hire cost.	Management fee + vendor costs.	Salaries, tools, infrastructure.
Scalability	Highly scalable, adapts to growth.	Excellent for fluctuating contingent needs.	Limited by team size and bandwidth.
Speed	Fast, with dedicated resources.	Fast vendor coordination.	Slower during hiring surges.
Control	Shared control, collaborative.	Vendor management layer.	Full control over the process.
Cultural Fit	Good, if the provider is embedded well.	Less relevant for contract roles.	Excellent understanding of culture.
Compliance	Provider handles it.	Strong compliance and vendor oversight.	You manage everything.
Technology	Provider brings tools and ATS.	A platform for vendor and workforce management.	You invest in your own tech stack.

How to Choose the Right Model

The truth is: there’s no one-size-fits-all answer here. The right recruitment model in India depends on where your organisation is right now and where it’s heading.

Start by asking yourself these questions:

1. What’s your hiring volume like?

If you’re hiring 50+ people a quarter, RPO makes sense. If you have 5-10 roles trickling in, in-house might be more cost-effective.

2. Are you hiring permanent or temporary staff?

Permanent roles lean toward RPO or in-house. Contract and gig workers? Working with MSPs can be a better strategy.

3. Do you have hiring spikes?

Seasonal businesses or project-based companies benefit from MSP or RPO because they can scale resources up and down as per business requirements. More importantly, speed matters. In-house recruitment typically takes 36 to 42 days to fill a role. If you’re growing fast or entering a new market, that timeline can kill momentum. RPO providers often cut this in half.

4. What’s your internal HR bandwidth?

If your HR team is already stretched thin, outsourcing recruitment through RPO frees them up for strategic work and enables them to do other high-value tasks.

5. How mature is your employer brand?

Strong brands attract talent easily, making in-house hiring more effective. Lesser-known companies often struggle with in-house recruitment and benefit from RPO providers with larger talent networks.

6. What’s your budget?

In-house requires ongoing investment in people and tools. RPO has predictable costs. MSP reduces headcount while managing workforce variability.

Case Scenarios (When RPO/MSP/In-house makes sense)

To understand each recruitment model even better, let’s look at some case studies that can help you make the decision.

Scenario 1: A Bangalore-based SaaS startup scaling from 100 to 500 employees

This company is growing fast. They need to hire across engineering, sales, marketing, and customer success. Their small in-house team of 2 recruiters can’t keep up.

Best fit: RPO. The startup can partner with an RPO provider to ramp up quickly without the delay of hiring and training internal recruiters. The RPO team acts as an extension, maintaining the company’s culture and brand while delivering volume.

Scenario 2: A Mumbai retail chain hiring seasonal staff for festival sales

Every Diwali and New Year, this chain needs an additional 300-400 temporary workers across stores. Post-season, the requirement drops to almost zero.

Best fit: MSP. An MSP can coordinate with multiple staffing agencies, ensure compliance, manage contracts, and bring in the right people at the right time without the retailer needing to maintain relationships with dozens of vendors.

Scenario 3: A mid-sized manufacturing company with steady hiring needs

This company hires 3-5 people per month, mostly for roles like production managers, quality engineers, and supply chain specialists. They value deep industry knowledge and cultural alignment.

Best fit: In-house recruitment. Their hiring volume doesn’t justify RPO costs, and the roles are permanent, so MSP isn’t relevant. A dedicated in-house recruiter who understands manufacturing can handle this comfortably.

Scenario 4: A large IT services firm managing 10,000+ contract consultants

This firm works with over 50 staffing vendors and deploys consultants to client sites across India. Managing vendor compliance, timesheets, invoicing, and quality is a nightmare.

Best fit: MSP. The firm needs a centralised system to manage its entire contingent workforce. An MSP brings technology, governance, and efficiency to vendor management.

Conclusion

Choosing between RPO vs MSP India or sticking with in-house recruitment isn’t about picking the “best” model. It’s about picking the right model for your organization’s needs.

RPO works when you need to scale permanent hiring quickly. MSP is your go-to for managing contract and gig workers efficiently. In-house recruitment gives you control and alignment but requires consistent investment and bandwidth.

Many organizations don’t stick to just one model. They mix and match. A company might use in-house for leadership hiring, RPO for mid-level volume hiring and MSP for managing contractors. The key is understanding your hiring patterns, budget, and long-term talent strategy. Once you have that clarity, the right recruitment model will become obvious.

Want to know more about how talent partners can help you level up your talent games? Click here to know more.

FAQs

Is RPO cheaper than traditional recruitment?

It usually depends on the situation. RPOs can be more cost-effective at scale because you avoid the overhead of maintaining a large in-house team, the costs of recruiting tools, and training. However, for low-volume hiring, in-house might be cheaper. You should always compare the total cost of ownership, not just the per-hire fee.

When is MSP better than RPO?

MSP is better when you’re managing a contingent workforce (contractors, freelancers, consultants) rather than permanent employees. If your hiring needs are project-based or seasonal, MSP gives you flexibility and vendor management efficiency that RPO doesn’t focus on.

Do startups need RPO?

Again, it depends on your requirements. Early-stage startups with limited budgets and slow hiring can manage with in-house or fractional recruiters. But if you’re in hyper-growth mode and need to hire 10+ people a month, RPO becomes a strategic advantage. It saves time and helps you compete for talent with bigger players.

Can models be combined?

Absolutely yes, many companies actually do this, for example, they might keep senior leadership hiring in-house for control, use RPO for bulk technical hiring, and bring in MSP to manage contractors. This gives you flexibility without locking into one model.

How long does RPO implementation take?

Typically, 4 to 8 weeks. This includes understanding your hiring needs, integrating systems, training the RPO team on your culture and processes, and setting up workflows. Some providers offer faster onboarding, but expect at least a month before you see consistent results.